Deeper Truths about Authenticity

What is needed to become an Incarnation, you know? Tremendous courage, to trust the authentic visions and darshans and the metaphysical experiences happening in you. Yesterday when Gnanasambandam gave me the darshan, it was a second moment treating. I should have the tremendous courage to go behind it. I could have thought: “No, let Me refer and then I will come and declare tomorrow.” It won’t work. Declare now. He has said it - done. Put yourself, taking the responsibility of the risk, of proof of this experience.

Second, when you guys brought seemingly negative evidence, having the ability to look in and find out with the right context: “Yes, he is uttering the word about edible, but what way? He does not have pattern...” Clear? (Swamiji laughing). Clarity, ability, strength, to have the patience, not giving up and approaching it with the right context, even if the negative evidences are brought.

Now when you look in, every line, every word, what a pure child. There are some more references today I received. I now itself declare: All those references will not have the food pattern meaning. I have not seen those references... They will not have the food pattern meaning. I’ll speak on every reference and prove My Jnanasambandar is right. I’ll defend Him. (applause) Get any number of references.

When you see a sugar cane and you don’t remember the taste of it, I promise, he never tasted it. If you have tested even once, you cannot go without remembering the sweetness of it. And not one food item, 5 food item. He’s born and brought up in Tanjore, which is filled with banana, rice and sugar patties and mango. And not a single item is referring with a taste. Even mango he’s referring to color... Once he says banana and refers at with some other reason, Ok. But 10 times he quotes different products. You see, it is not that in his time everybody was not eating. Whole world was eating. He is not saying the taste of any food. ‘Don’t eat’ may be the instruction, that does not mean He was eating.

All I’m saying is, he was in the Nirahari lifestyle and he did not have the pattern of Ahara lifestyle. And he does not refer to Ahara lifestyle and even if it was there in unconsciousness, it cannot be hidden in 4,000 verses… Get all the references more and more. Let Me tell you. So, this job of listening to Me is the job of making infinity into (showing a circle)... Either you can take My words now as a justification of My inauthenticity or leading you to authenticity.

If you think I’m leading you to authenticity, you are a disciple. If you think I’m justifying the inauthenticity, you are a dead tractor... Clear? And I take the responsibility even for the inauthenticity of the dead tractors. And I will transform them, I won’t give up on them. (Applause). Clear now? Do you want to show any other references came? I’ll see all of them and then expand on further.

"குவலய மேத்தவி ருந்தவூராம்

தாறுடை வாழையிற் கூழைமந்தி

தகுகனி யுண்டுமிண் டிட்டினத்தைப், டிட்டினத்தைப்

பாறிடப் பாய்ந்து பயிலும்"

Understand, here he is referring, mandi means a monkey, he is eating the - the banana, the scene which he saw, which he sees and the best fruit, which he thinks he gives it to the child. Understand, here again it is only a scene he is seen. A monkey takes one fruit and eats banana and throws. He takes another one, eats, then he gives it to the child. What he thinks as good, he gives it to the child. Same way, what you think as you “good”, you give it to Me. Here again, he is not referring to any of the taste pattern.

See here:

தாறுடை வாழையிற் கூழைமந்தி

தகுகனி யுண்டுமிண் டிட்டினத்தை...

When, by eating, eating, if finds out of the qualification of the fruit and he does not measure anywhere the taste of the fruit.

தகுகனி உண்டு, மிண்டிட்டினத்தை…

After eating, what he, she thinks is the ripe, gives it to the child. If it is not ripe, he may not, she may not give it to the child. After it is ripe, it's the right way, even here, nowhere he refers, the taste.

சுவைகனி உண்டு... Doesn't say.

தகுகனி உண்டு...

Maybe the edible quality, the quality to chew, the ability to chew... If he says

சுவைகனி உண்டு...

over. It doesn't say

சுவைகனி உண்டு...

தகுகனி உண்டு...

means that a monkey chews the fruit and sees, chews the banana and sees whether the banana is chewable and then whatever is chewable gives it to the child.

(08:49)

These are all the scene you would have seen while He was walking through the paddy fields, going to place to place. Even here, He does not remem; ahhh; refer as the taste of the food. Understand? Come on, get. Next.

(09:12)

See it says:

தாறுடை கூழையாற்...

தாறுடை வாழையிற்...

means the whole bunch of the banana. The monkey stay, puts the mouth and whatever is qualified for the child to eat, it gives. It just describes the scene. He is not saying, whatever is tasty he is giving to the child, even there he is not referring the taste.

Next…

"தேனார்ந்தெழு கதலிக்கனி யுண்பான்றிகழ் மந்தி

மேனோக்கிநின் றிரங்கும்பொழி வேணுபுர மதுவே"

Understand, here He refers the expression of the monkey, when he eats something and shows, it shows very clearly, he has never tasted the food, he wa.., you see, when a monkey eats certain things and how he looks, even here he is not saying how he feels in the tongue, how he looks, so he doesn't know how he feels in the tongue. Understand!

"தேனார்ந்தெழு கதலிக்கனி யுண்பான்றிகழ் மந்தி

மேனோக்கிநின் றிரங்கும்..."

The joy which is expressed in the eyes of the monkey, which has eaten the fruit. HE would have seen. The monkey eating the fruit and after the joy with, joy, standing and gazing. So, even now He does not understand what monkey feels in the tongue. He only understands, what the monkey is showing in the eyes... Clear? No food pattern.

When you see a monkey eating a fruit, you will only remember, first the taste it’ll feel in it’s tongue. Am I right? But you remember and refer the joy which is radiating in his eyes, what do you mean? You do not know what the monkey is feeling in the tongue... If you know what the monkey is feeling in the tongue, will you remember, will you refer, what he’s showing in the eyes?... No, tell Me. All you guys tell Me logically.

He says: “When a monkey eats a banana and how He just gazes

மேனோக்கிநின் றிரங்கும்பொழில்...

How He gazes! He could have said how He felt the taste in the tongue. No, then next He talks about a rice paddy

கழிவிட்டுயர்…

"சங்கந்தரு கழிவிட்டுயர் செந்நெல்

வியன்மேவிவந் துறங்கும்பொழில் வேணுபுர மதுவே".

Means, He is referring the height of the rice paddy.

கழிவிட்டுயர் செந்நெல்...

Understand? He is not referring to the taste of this rice grain... When I read the whole, each references, it was almost like a doing psychoanalysis on Jnanasambandar. Clear? Anymore references - get it. And I know, My founder's words (laughing and applause) are true.