Deeper Truths about Authenticity

Renounce the beginning of your inauthenticity and end of your inauthenticity. Both will be pleasure. It is out of the pleasure memories inauthenticity arises. It is towards the pleasure inauthenticity drives. Memory to pleasure is the journey of inauthenticity. What is the length of inauthenticity? Mem, pleasure memory to pleasure is the length of inauthenticity. If you renounce both the ends, inauthenticity will shrink and disappear.

Understand, there is an elastic wrap, rubber, wire. You pull. One end is pleasure memory, other end is pleasure. If you renounce both the ends what will happen? It’ll shrink. Listen, If you pull both ends, this end is pleasure memory, this end is pleasure. From pleasure memory inauthenticity starts to, towards pleasure, pleasure it leads. If you remove the pleasure from both ends and renounce both ends, what happens? Inauthenticity shrinks and disappears and if you bring the twist in inauthenticity means… try to authenticate your inauthenticity, try to hide your inauthenticity by justifications. Now it is what? Nothing. Zero. Am I right? Zero. You bring the twist, it becomes infinity. Your inauthenticity will become infinite. That is maya.

Understand! It is zero. When you bring a twist in the inauthenticity, it becomes infinity. Am I right? Now it’s a symbol of infinity. So maya is அனாதி(anadhi) when it is twisted by the justification. Authenticity become, sorry understand, inauthenticity becomes infinite when you twist it with justification. How many of you feel, “God. The maya in front of me is so big, Infinite. When will I cross this?” Authentic raise your hand. When you stop justifying your inauthenticity, infinite will become zero.

Infinite is not infinite. If you can drop your justification of your inauthenticity. How many of you know, still you are justifying your inauthenticity? Raise your hand. I’ll raise My hand. Understand. I’m giving you the shock. I’ll explain now, how... How many of you authentically with integrity justify? Please, tell Me. With authenticity and integrity declare how many of you really still justify your inauthenticities? Raise your hand. So, for all of you: maya is infinite. Just now I made a statement. I also do the same. With only one small twist, I know any moment I can remove this twist.

The identity which I’m showing as an Incarnation hood is a twist which I have to play, for you to understand the twist. The body I'm carrying is not infinite. The being I'm projecting to you is not infinite. The being I feel is infinite. The being I'm projecting to you is not infinite. That is what I mean, even this form is not ultimate. When you come near, I will… see this rubber band, looks now infinite. This is not infinite. What for it is shown like infinite when you come near, this infinite will be shown to you and the science will be shown to you how to make this as zero again.

When you end from My one end of listening to My words, the infinite will be shown. When you travel, travel, travel, travel, travel towards Me, the zero will be shown. By then you will know the science of moving from infinite to zero. That is what Krishna means when He says: “If you know Me you will be liberated.” If you know My zero you will become zero. Are you listening?... I’ll give you the example:

Yesterday I declared a statement: Jnanasambandhar does not talk about any food, about any food item. Jnanasambhandar gave Me a Darshan and told Me: “I do not have a food pattern, so I’d never sang anything of food pattern in Me, in My verses.” I declared that, but Tamil department, Publication department discovered some 5 references where he speaks about, he mentions the word ‘sugar cane’, ‘banana’, ‘mango’ and the ‘rice grain’, ‘rice grain’. 5 places, 5 or 6 references they brought. You understand! Now, what you will think? ‘The Swamiji’s vision of Jnanasambhandar is not authentic.’ Is it not ? That is where you have to land, come to the conclusion.

But when I went to the room and read the print out line by line, I was so happy. I tell you, I was so happy. I discovered what Jnanasambhandar said is a complete truth. Honest truth. He lived without any food pattern in his whole life, because all five names of the food items he is using just to refer their colours, never as a eatable product. Understand, when he sees mango, he remembers the colour of yellow. He is using the example of mango not for the taste, colour of yellow. When is talking about sugar cane, he is not using for the taste of the sugar cane, the height of the sugar cane. 5 eatable, edible products he is using, not even once he is mentioning related to the food pattern. Do you understand?

God. What he said is true. What Jnanasambhandar said is true... Read all the 5 references. Nowhere he is connecting that product to the taste. The moment I utter the word ‘sugar cane’, what do you remember? Read.

“கையரு கேகனி வாழையீன்று கானலெல் லாங்கமழ் காட்டுப்பள்ளிப் பையருப் கேயழல் வாயவைவாய் பாம்பணை யான்பணைத் தோளிபா, பணைத் தோளிபாகம்…”

He is not using the banana with the taste. Please understand. What he is telling:

கையரு கேகனி வாழையீன்று கானலெல் லாங்கமழ் காட்டுப்பள்ளிப்...

Means, when you cut the banana wether the, after it ripes or the tree, it doesn't die. It goes on multiplying, becomes a forest. So the banana is not referred here as the edible. It is referred here to the point of expansion.

பையருப் கேபழல், கேயழல் வாயவைவாய் பாம்பணை...

(10:41) (10:47) “முடிகையி னாற்றொடு மோட்டுழவர் முன்கைத் தருக்கைக் கரும்பின்கட்டி கடிகையி னாலெறி காட்டுப்பள்ளி...” (10:55)

Here what he says: முன்கைத் தருக்கைக் கரும்பின்கட்டி...

Means, just like a sugar cane - the hand \>\>Swamiji is measuring his arm with his hand\>\>

All of you understand? So he is referring the measurement of the sugar cane, not the taste of the sugar cane. Context is not the taste of the food. If he refers ‘tiger’, for somebody it can be the context of food, because they eat. If he refers as ‘Rishabham’, buffet, bull. For somebody it can be reference of the food because they eat McDonald’s burger, but what he means by the ‘Rishabham’, he means the vehicle of Shiva. Understand? So, you cannot bring this as a reference to tell: He referred about edibles. Then he speaks about Rishabham. What about that?

தோடுடையசெவி யன்விடையேறி…

Second line is edible. \>\>Swamiji laughing\>\> Am I right?

தோடுடையசெவி யன்விடையேறிய பங்கன்... காடுடையசுட லைப்பொடிபூசி

So, how he measures the, how he refers the bull, the same way only he refers the sugar cane. All of you understand? Now, this is this. \>\>Swamiji showing rubber band as infinite\>\> This can be considered as the justification of what I declared. Superficially. If you walk in, you will understand this zero. When you walk into Me by listening, you will understand the authenticity of the declaration yesterday happened. Yesterday, I did not tell this in the satsang. Yesterday I only told in the satsang: I referred throughout, ah, 4000 songs. There is no reference about the food. That’s what I made a statement yesterday. Am I right?

But today what statement I made. Jnanasambhandar gave Me Darshan and told Me... Actually, honestly I have not read all the 4000 verses. Even if I have started preparing whole night, can I go through all the 4000 verses? When I revealed in the yesterday's satsang, I… I revealed as if… I had been through. See, first time when I declared, in all 4000 verses there is no word of ‘Saiva Siddhanta’, at that time also I never verified. Jnanasambhandar verified and told Me. It was a Darshan. Yesterday again it was a Darshan of Jnanasambhandar. He told Me: “Ey, I don’t, I haven’t, I lived as Nirahari. I don’t have a food pattern. I never sang about food in my verses. You declare this.” That is why I declared.

Now what I showed yesterday is this \>\>Swamiji showing rubber band as infinite\>\> Complication. The infinity maya. Especially the statement I made, I did not even make it very clearly, that Jnanasambhandar told Me and all that. I just said: “All 4000 verses I verified, he never sang about... what? Food. When you hear that statement, when you look at Me, you feel I’m infinite ‘Oh God! How can this fellow finish all 4000 verses? It is so authentic. It is true. Oh. Wow. Wow. Wow. Wow.’ When you bring these 5 reference you can say: He is just justifying. Now any refe., anything I respond to it, you can call it as justification of his inauthenticity. Then I continue to stand as justification of inauthenticity to you. Only then hoax scandals are created.

But when I let you listen and ask you to come in and give you the references of all five, see, is there anywhere, he is connecting with these items with the taste or eating? How many worked and got these five references? Do you understand what I said now? Not a single place, he equates them with the taste or eating. You understand? He is not saying ‘the taste of sugar cane’ he is saying ‘shape of sugar cane’.

In every reference, I only see all other things related to the food... He even talks about the medicine, but never talks about as eating. In Hindu tradition சுக்கு is medicine, medicine especially Tamil Na, Tamil Nadu, சுக்கு is a medicine.

“இடுதுயர்க் காயொடு சுக்குத்தின்னும் நிலையமண் தேரரை நீங்கிநின்று…”

Means

இலைமரு தேயழ காகநாளும் இடுதுவர்க் காயொடு சுக்குத்தின்னும்…

Means ma, understand, it is a old type of alcohol method.

இடுதுவர்க் காயொடு சுக்குத்தின்னும்...

Which is a poison, the எட்டிகாய், எட்டிகா, a very little quantity of the எட்டி with the சுக்கு, சுக்கு is the poison breaker. It breaks poison. எட்டி is the poison. A very little quantity of poison with the சுக்கு, which is poison breaker, it comes up as alcohol. So when you take that, it raises to the head, that kind of person can’t have Shiva. Shiva moves out of him.

So, even here he does not refer food. He refers about medicine. I went through each reference. I just felt “Oh Mahadeva. You came.” Every reference strengthened My trust towards the experience. Authentified, authenticated Jnanasambhandars’ Darshan and I declare today with Integrity and Authenticity, taking Responsibility and Enriching others and Me with the clarity of ‘I won’t give up on Me and others and everything and world.’ I declare: “Janasambhandars’ grace and blessings are there on Me and he is going to express through this body powerfully as 293.”